One space or two? A CMS editor answers her most frequently asked question

Mary Laur, an editor for The Chicago Manual of Style, says part of her job is fielding the inevitable questions. Just like anyone who works in IT is charged with fixing his mother’s wireless router (Hi Mom!), she gets asked to settle her friends’ grammar and usage disputes. Her most popular challenge: is it one space after a period at the end of a sentence, or two?

The Manual’s answer to this question is simple enough—one—but I have learned from experience that everyone who asks it wants me to say two. Often I suspect they know my answer in advance and hope to pick a fight with me. Even before I became part of the Manual revision team, I once had exactly this argument with my graduate advisor, who eventually relented and accepted my master’s thesis minus the extra spacing. Now, I am just old enough to understand that anyone who took a high school typing course through the 1980s internalized “period-space-space” through countless hours of practice drills, and to many of these people, “period-space” just looks wrong.

I learned to type on a typewriter in the 90s, so two spaces are hardwired into my muscle memory too. I’ve known for some time that one space is now proper usage, but relaying that from my brain to my fingers as I type is next to impossible. Laur points out that computer fonts generally correct for this anyway. Using Twitter may help me overcome the two-space habit though, because when every character is precious I make sure to conserve space.

Matt Wood

Matt Wood is a book review editor for TriQuarterly, and a writer and social media specialist for the University of Chicago Medicine. He graduated from the Master of Arts in Creative Writing program at Northwestern University in 2007, where his final thesis, "Through an Unlocked Door," won the Distinguished Thesis Award.

Twitter: @woodtang

More Info:

woodtang.com

Science Life


Previous
Previous

Poetry Roundup: Rosemurgy, Dobyns, and Lantz

Next
Next

Flipboard points to the future of reading