TriQuarterly Blog

Music and Writing

by Gretchen Kalwinski on Feb 03, 2012

Literarily: Print and Digital Lit MagsLiterarily: Print and Digital Lit Mags

Goldie Goldbloom, my current workshop instructor, has been urging us to really immerse ourselves in the tone and feeling of our fiction submissions. Meaning, she wants us to think deeply about place/location—even going so far as to draw a map of where our story is set. She’s also recommending that while we write, we listen to music that is relevant to our story. I’m conflicted about this advice. On the one hand, I think listening to music can help you set the tone of your work, and that tone may well come out beautifully in the writing. At the same time, I have difficulty writing alongside any music containing words, so my music go-tos are usually jazz or avant-garde classical: Edgar Varese, Thelonious Monk, Mum, Django Reinhardt, Cecilia Bartoli, Cesaria Evora (those last 2 are singers, but if I can’t understand the language, words are weirdly okay). But I admit, none of those musicians has anything remotely to do with my story. If I was going to listen to music pertinent to my manuscript, it’d likely be 70s country rock, which I find tough to write with.

Because I’ve been thinking about this lately, this article on The Millions literary magazine about book “soundtracks” really hit home. I agree with the author that the popularity of this idea has much to do with readers feeling as though it allows them to know the author more intimately and have insights into aspects of the work that might otherwise be hidden. And, I do love the idea of curating a soundtrack to my novel after it’s written.

This train of thought reminded me of an interview I did with author/teacher Elizabeth Merrick for Venus Zine a few years ago. Reading this again reminded me that although she loved to listen and write, for her, listening to music was only possible during certain phases of the writing process. So, maybe I just need to try out the 70s country rock while generating text rather than during the editing phase, as I’ve been doing. Fingers crossed. 

Do you listen to music while you’re writing?

In the early phases, yes. I’ll drive and drive and drive and the stories will show up. And then at a certain point, the music will start jangling and I’ll hear the characters speaking, and I’ll have to turn the music off. What the music does is get me into my right brain-all of the intuition stuff-and then once I can access that and the story is there, I turn it off. The music for me is the way to feel unconstricted. 

From The Truth Is Stranger Than Department

by Eldad Malamuth on Jan 29, 2012

At Stake: Writing and LawAt Stake: Writing and LawSyracuse City Court recently hosted a strange wedding proposal.  Nicole Osbourne was in court facing felony assault charges.  Her boyfriend, Theodore Murphy, watched from the gallery.  Osbourne’s defense attorney informed the judge that she had an usual request.  The attorney turned to her client and relayed a request from Murphy that she marry him.  Osbourne began crying.

If this proposal seems unromantic, there is an explanation.  Besides the assault charges, Osbourne faced a separate domestic violence case, pursuant to which she could have no direct or third-party contact with Murphy.  Indeed, it would have violated the court order for the defense attorney to share Murphy’s answer with him.  The prosecution moved to amend the order of protection to allow non-criminal contact between Osbourne and Murphy.  Osbourne turned to Murphy and accepted. 

Everyone was happy.  Bail was set at $2,500 for each case, but Murphy apparently couldn’t come up with the money and Osbourne remained in custody.

In a past entry here, I admonished writers to make legal scenes realistic.  I’ll admit, if I were reading a story with the above scene in a workshop or from a slush-pile, I would raise my eyebrows.  Maybe I need to broaden my sense of the plausible.  Weird things happen, even - or perhaps especially - in courts. 

However, I note that the weird scene stems from the people, not from any arcane rule of law.  The courtroom might provide a stage for people's dramas to unfold, but it is the people driving the scene, not legislation or court rules.  It’s a good model for fiction.  Perhaps the inevitable divorce proceedings would make a good short story.

Ruled Out

by Gretchen Kalwinski on Jan 24, 2012

Literarily: Print and Digital Lit MagsLiterarily: Print and Digital Lit MagsI was listening to the Canadian Broadcasting Company yesterday and heard an interview with prolific writer Elmore Leonard (the novelist/screenwriter who penned Get Shorty, 3:10 to Yuma and current F/x series Justified), which referenced his widely circulated “10 rules of writing.” 

As I’m digging back into Act 1 of my novel, it seems like a good time to revisit them. In brief, the logical but oft-broken rules are:

 

  1.  Never open a book with weather.
  2.  Avoid prologues.
  3.  Never use a verb other than "said" to carry dialogue.
  4.  Never use an adverb to modify the verb "said”…he admonished gravely.
  5.  Keep your exclamation points under control. You are allowed no more than two or three per 100,000 words  of prose. 
  6.  Never use the words "suddenly" or "all hell broke loose."
  7.  Use regional dialect, patois, sparingly.
  8.  Avoid detailed descriptions of characters.
  9.  Don't go into great detail describing places and things.
  10.  Try to leave out the part that readers tend to skip.

Some of these are painful to absorb; it’s hard out here for an adverb-lover. But when critiquing a piece of writing with these rules in mind, it’s hard to disagree with a single one. The CBC is running a contest based on Leonard's rules: The winner must write a single sentence that breaks as many of them as possible. 

“All you have to do is knock us out with a truly amazing sentence and you could be one of our five finalists. Winners will have their rule-breaking sentences featured on Day 6 and published in The National Post. We'll also send winners three great Elmore Leonard books courtesy of HarperCollins.”

When the Guardian covered Leonard’s rules, they asked other writers to contribute their own rules. I’ve pasted a few of the meatier gems below. Enjoy. 

Margaret Atwood:

You most likely need a thesaurus, a rudimentary grammar book, and a grip on reality. This latter means: there's no free lunch. Writing is work. It's also gambling. You don't get a pension plan. Other people can help you a bit, but ­essentially you're on your own. ­Nobody is making you do this: you chose it, so don't whine.

Roddy Doyle:

Do not place a photograph of your ­favourite author on your desk, especially if the author is one of the famous ones who committed suicide.
 Do be kind to yourself. Fill pages as quickly as possible; double space, or write on every second line. Regard every new page as a small triumph 

Richard Ford:

Marry somebody you love and who thinks you being a writer's a good idea. 
Don't have children.
 Don't read your reviews.

Diana Athill:

Read it aloud to yourself because that's the only way to be sure the rhythms of the sentences are OK (prose rhythms are too complex and subtle to be thought out – they can be got right only by ear).

Jonathan Franzen:

The most purely autobiographical ­fiction requires pure invention. Nobody ever wrote a more auto­biographical story than "The Meta­morphosis"

Esther Freud:

Don't wait for inspiration. Discipline is the key. Trust your reader. Not everything needs to be explained. If you really know something, and breathe life into it, they'll know it too.

Neil Gaiman:

Remember: when people tell you something's wrong or doesn't work for them, they are almost always right. When they tell you exactly what they think is wrong and how to fix it, they are almost always wrong.

PD James:

Increase your word power. Words are the raw material of our craft. The greater your vocabulary the more ­effective your writing. We who write in English are fortunate to have the richest and most versatile language in the world. Respect it.

Al Kennedy:

Write. No amount of self-inflicted misery, altered states, black pullovers or being publicly obnoxious will ever add up to your being a writer. Writers write. On you go. 
Read. As much as you can. As deeply and widely and nourishingly and irritatingly as you can. And the good things will make you remember them, so you won't need to take notes.

Hilary Mantel:

Read Becoming a Writer, by Dorothea Brande. Then do what it says, including the tasks you think are impossible. You will particularly hate the advice to write first thing in the morning, but if you can manage it, it might well be the best thing you ever do for yourself. This book is about becoming a writer from the inside out. Many later advice manuals derive from it. You don't ­really need any others, though if you want to boost your confidence, "how to" books seldom do any harm. You can kick-start a whole book with some little writing exercise.

Michael Moorcock:

Find an author you admire (mine was Conrad) and copy their plots and characters in order to tell your own story, just as people learn to draw and paint by copying the masters.

Lit in Chicago: Resolved to be Resolved

by Patrick Carberry on Jan 23, 2012

As the new car smell fades from 2012 and resolutions quickly drift into obscurity, I have decided to stand firm to mine.  I am resolved.  I will attend more of Chicago’s literary readings/events in 2012. 

Sure, it’s easy to belittle literary readings, to mock the people who snap and the hipster-poets who shout “What!?” as an awkward affirmation of the writer’s work.  But like all art (performance literature included), some is bad. Some poets rely too heavily on stock intonation.  Some fiction writers don’t read their work aloud before performance, which results in a dryness to rival Charlie Rose.  But some is not all, and I have been moved at literary events.  They have challenged me to consider literature’s intersection with community and technologies (new and old)—I like that.  The Chicago writer Jill Summers (accompanied by her sister, Susie Kirkwood) couples her fiction with intricate and impressive shadow puppet shows.  Poet Shannon Maney uses a looper and plays a mandolin to create beautiful, captivating works.  These writers’ performances are undeniably affecting; they touch some part of me that words on a page (or screen) can’t always reach.      

Chicago plays host to nearly forty (!) reading series (a number which still excludes magazine launches, author readings/signings, conferences, pop up book stores, library events, etc.), so there is no reason to sit at home and watch a third consecutive episode of ABC’s Winter Wipeout.  There is a community of writers and artists seeking an audience, seeking participants.  The longest running poetry slam in the country takes place on Sunday nights at The Green Mill in Uptown.  Most Sunday nights I sit in pajamas and eat until I’m nauseous.  A poetry slam every now and then will be good medicine.

Basically—at the end of 2012 I don’t want to say that I skipped a Michael Chabon reading because TNT was airing The Fifth Element again—which I did, embarrassingly, once do.  I want to remember this year as the year of great literary performance, of writers, writing, and being social—which is, of course, what readings are all about. 

 

Back in the Saddle

by Gretchen Kalwinski on Jan 18, 2012

Literarily: Print and Digital Lit MagsLiterarily: Print and Digital Lit Mags

It’s tough to get back in the swing after the holidays, isn’t it? January work deadlines seem to come fast and furious, and there’s that holiday sugar addiction to overcome. Therefore this post will just be a snap shot of the stuff up on my screen - stuff I think you should be reading, too.

First, there’s the Chicago Reader fiction issue, judged by the instructor of my current fiction workshop at Northwestern, Goldie Goldbloom. One of the stories chosen was “The Gentle Grift,” a revenge-oriented tale by my classmate Tim Chapman.

Next, because of my recent obsession with Downton Abbey, I stumbled across this Galley Cat post about a reading list relevant to the PBS series (Siegfried Sassoon, Rupert Brooke, etc.).

For a little levity, I’m reading the McSweeeney’s piece about Paula Deen and pole dancing: “I’d like to teach you one of my very favorite pole moves: the Buttercake Spin. It’s such a pretty move, y’all—your legs are going to look just like egg-beaters fluffing through a bowl of cream cheese!”

Also up on my screen is a fascinating post up by Brainpicker about a “master plotting” book.The art of mechanized storytelling, or what a cardboard robot has to do with melodrama and Law & Order.” And I’m saving this article about the literary history of word processing for my morning coffee tomorrow.

Good luck to all of you with your 2012 resolutions, and, if you’re anything like me, weaning yourself from that holiday-centric 10-cookies-per-day.

 

Feeling Listless

by Mark Rentfro on Dec 18, 2011

Hours of the Universe: The Bookstore CosmonautHours of the Universe: The Bookstore Cosmonaut

Here is a list of my favorite things about December in descending order:

5. The Dallas Cowboys have yet to fall out of the NFL playoff hunt.

4. As much Turkey as I ate on Thanksgiving, I know I will eat still more before the year is out.

3. A Charlie Brown Christmas

2. The guy who rings the Salvation Army bell at the corner of Church and Sherman in Evanston.

1. End of year lists.

There are lists of the year’s best, and the year’s most, and the year’s worst, and the year’s least. The list, so goes the saying, goes on and on. I read them, love them, mark them up, and in January I throw them away. I suspect you are no different. Now, though, I will let you in on a little secret. Each year, about this time, I make a list of my own. Don’t believe me? That will go on two lists: A List of Things Mark Will Never Know and A List of Things About Which Mark Has No Opinion. Without further ado, here is A List of At-best Marginally Literary Things That Mark Really Liked About 2011 in a Very Specific Order, The Algorithm for Which He Will Not At This Time Divulge:

1. Kindle Fire – I know. I’m the bookstore guy. I’m supposed to hate it and everything it stands for. Amazon has been extra naughty lately. But this was an early Christmas gift from someone I love, and I bought nearly every word Charles Dickens ever published for $2.99. The Dark Side of The Force is rife with temptation.

2. Book People – I went back to Texas for a few days this summer, and stopped by this local gem the afternoon I was in Austin. It’s two floors of literary, air- conditioned bliss. The "Staff Recommendations" are thoughtful, the selection is wide and well organized, and the list of in-store readings is always exciting. It was a nice reminder, after a few months in Chicago, that Texas truly is the Promised Land.

3. Shakespeare at Winedale – On that same trip to Texas, I spent a night in the booming metropolis of Round Top, Texas. My sister was an English major at The University (of Texas), and is now working on an MFA in Shakespeare Performance at Mary Baldwin College. She is both the sweetest and most talented person I know. She spent the summer performing at Winedale and seeing her ply her craft was, as always, one of the great joys of my year.

4. Victory for St. Mark’s Bookshop – Score one for the good guys. I wrote about it here a few weeks ago, which I will allow that to assuage my guilt for loving my Kindle so much.

5. The Pale King – David Foster Wallace's posthumous novel is as unfinished as death is final. The first chapter, published by TriQuarterly, might also be the most beautiful thing I’ve ever read. I read it three consecutive times on the bus from Evanston to downtown Chicago, and had to put it down because I have a policy against crying in public.

6. The death of Clarence Clemons – This isn’t something that I liked about 2011. In fact, it’s one of those things that will forever mar the year in my memory, but it bears mentioning. It may be that energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but the same is not true of soul. Now that the Big Man is gone, there will forever be just a little bit less of that in the universe.

7. Calamity Song - the Decemberists' music video for this single off of their 2011 release, The King is Dead, is inspired by the Eschaton scene in Infinite Jest. I hereby pronounce 2011: The Year of the chewable Ambien tab. 

That's where I'll leave you for this year. I hope the end of 2011 finds you at least as happy as it finds me. Whatever celebration you make as the year comes to an end, I hope you find yourself making it with someone you love, or at least someone you don't want to punch in the head. 

My Top Seven Literary Events of 2011

by Vincent Francone on Dec 18, 2011

With a Small p: Everyday Reflections on PoetryWith a Small p: Everyday Reflections on PoetryAs it is the end of the year, I want to present a list of literary events that shaped my year. When confronted with the words “literary events” one naturally assumes “public readings.” Not me.  I only went to one reading this year and that was an open mic event at my local used bookstore, the Armadillo’s Pillow.  I was one of two people who read, and I only read when my lovely wife insisted I do so. The audience was no more than five people, including my dog, but I felt more relaxed at this reading than at others, and I read better as a result. So this will serve as my first entry on a list I’m calling “Vince’s Top Seven Literary Events of 2011.” 

7. Reading a poem at the Armadillo’s Pillow. (See above.)

6. Deciding that life is too short to go to poetry readings. Often, I am told that I should go to more readings, if for no other reason than to be a part of the community of poets. To this I have no response, as I would very much like to be part of this community, though if admission rests solely on going to readings I may forever find myself outside the gates. I do not dislike poetry readings altogether, but I find that poets at such events often sacrifice their natural voice when transitioning from obligatory introductions (why can't the poem simply speak for itself?) to their actual work. Their tone shifts from conversational and engaging to overly serious and affected. I find this alienating.

5. Rereading Joyce Mansour, Mina Loy, and Nick Laird - three very different poets who have been on my mind these days. In an ideal world, I would write with their combined strengths.

4. Reading The Stray Dog Cabaret and realizing that, a) the Silver Age Russian poets are where it’s at, and, b) that translation can be beautiful even when it takes liberties. Translator Paul Schmidt definitely turns the work of these poets (Mayakovsky, Akhmatova, Tsvetaeva, Khlebnikov, Pasternak, Blok, and Mandelstam) into something very much his own. The book is hardly complete or definitive, and, again, the translations take some serious liberties, but the result is an imagined conversation between these writers that no other anthology has matched. 

3. Reading poems for TriQuarterly. This has certainly helped me understand what submission readers are thinking when wading through the "slush," an invaluable experience.

2. Sunday lunch at D’Amato’s. Between classes, I race to D’Amato’s for a slice of cheese and a slice of veggie pizza and, often, a cannoli. While devouring this incomparably delicious lunch, I read some poems, as the experience demands a good poem in accompaniment. Perhaps my greatest success was when I paired the thick, soft bread laden with tomato and spinach with the organic, earthy poems of Luljeta Lleshanaku.

1. Rediscovering Tom Wait’s Alice. Ever since the age of thirteen, I’ve been a Tom Waits fan. His new record is pretty good, though it caused me to dig back into his past catalog, which, in turn, caused me to rediscover Alice, a neglected masterpiece. I have never believed that song lyrics are anything close to poetry (sorry Bob Dyaln, you’re not a poet), but the song “Poor Edward” makes me reconsider my position. Not that the lyrics are poetic, but the entire experience of listening to the song—words and music—is close to the feeling that comes with reading a good poem. I get chills every time I hear this song.  

The List of Lists

by Gretchen Kalwinski on Dec 16, 2011

Literarily: Print and Digital Lit MagsLiterarily: Print and Digital Lit Mags

It’s that time of year...when every publication is obliged to generate a "best of year” reading list. The New York Times weighed in with mostly predictable choices - The Art of Fielding, which TQO blogger Mark Rentfro wrote about here, Stephen King's new time portal novel 11/22/63, and Arguably, essays by the late Christopher Hitchens, whom the Times describes as an "intellectual omnivore." I was surprised to find Karen Russell's Swamplandia! - a spectacular book about an alligator theme park, that, um, I'll admit I purchased at Anthropologie. Incidentally, it's being turned into an HBO series

Salon took a slightly different tack, instead asking writers to choose their favorite 2011 books; Jeffrey Eugenides chose The Empty Family, a collection of stories by Colm Toibin; Ann Patchett went with The Family Fang by Kevin Wilson, which delves into a family of performance artists; and Paula McLain, in turn choosing Patchett’s State of Wonder, about a research doctor in the Brazilian Amazon, sent on a mission to discover the mysterious circumstances of a friend’s “murky death.” Swamplandia! gets another mention here, chosen as Caitlin Horrock’s 2011 favorite.

Not to be outdone, The Atlantic also had their writers and editors share their favorite tomes, (not necessarily from 2011). Among the honorees were Julian Barnes's The Sense of an EndingThe Marriage Plot by Jeffrey Eugenides , Open by Andre Agassi, and A Visit From the Goon Squad by Jennifer Egan (the winner of the Pulitzer).

The Guardian organized their 2011 list in a "best books for giving" series with helpful categories. Their fiction list included Goon Squad; also Barnes’s above-mentioned Booker winner, The Sense of an Ending, “a meditation on memory and regret slyly conveyed through the unreliable voice of a complacent man.” Haruki Murakami’s 1Q84 made the list with its “cults, conspiracies and lost lovers aplenty in this vast labyrinth of a novel,” as did Roddy Doyle’s Bullfighting, “tales of deceptively ‘ordinary’ middle-aged men.” (As a book-gifter, I appreciated the vast array of categories; everything from music, art, science, psychology, quirky, stocking fillers, and biography.)

NPR's list also categorized helpfully, sorting titles into the best "book club books" and "bookseller picks." I was happy to see that the Publisher’s Weekly list included not only The Marriage Plot and State of Wonder, but also mentioned Tina Fey's Bossypants, a laugh out loud summer read of mine, and described Fey as “a celebrity who can write.” They also mentioned Robert Massie's Catherine the Great, Paul Hendrickson's Hemingway's Boat, and Christopher Hitchens “being himself” in his previously mentioned collection of essays, Arguably.  

Taking a slightly different approach to end-of-year reading, Ploughshares listed winter reads, noting, “There are many different ways to respond to the weather that is bearing down on this part of the world. Alcohol is an old strategy; SAD lamps are a newer one. For our money, nothing beats books. Here is a wintry mix of our literary strategies for getting through the season.” They go on to list Dostoevsky, Bronte, Harper Lee, and local writer Dan Beachy Quick’s A Whaler’s Dictionary, among others. The Ploughshares list is my favorite, but if I was conducting an extremely unscientific popularity contest of my small sampling, I’d find the clear “winners” of the 2011 lists to be Goon Squad, Marriage Plot, Swamplandia, Arguably, State of Wonder, and The Sense of an Ending. But whether you follow these lists to the letter or use them as points of departure, they provide a nice jump-start to your holiday gifting.

 

Spellbinding

by Mark Rentfro on Dec 13, 2011

Hours of the Universe: The Bookstore CosmonautHours of the Universe: The Bookstore CosmonautThere is an unassuming storefront on Washington Street in Evanston, just south and west of the Main Street L and Metra stations, which houses the Chicago Rare Book Center. The front door opens on to what could be the studio apartment of an occasionally fastidious book collector. Or at least it could be if said collector had unfailing taste and funds (and no kitchen or bed). For all of the books with short, typed descriptions of their significance tucked neatly in their jackets in the twenty to thirty feet of glass cases that line the east and west walls of the shop’s anterior, there is another stack of boxed books (including, I have on good faith, a magnificent early edition of Johnson’s dictionary, a most staggering example of human intellect). When I inquired in passing about a signed first edition of Infinite Jest, I was given a full tour of that volume, as well as a test drive of a complete collection of the original serial edition of Dombey and Son and a volume of Yeats poems apparently signed from beyond the grave by the man himself. For every book in the case, there is a story, and any of the four store’s partners are happy to tell you any one of them.

Ann, Paul, Tom, and Pat, the store’s partners, are also happy to let you browse in peace. On one of my recent visits, Tom was occupied helping a would-be-seller find a buyer for some obscure book with an apparently interesting collection of maps. After my girlfriend and I had made enough laps of the ground floor to send me in search of a chair, Tom called out to us,

“Folks, there are more books downstairs. Feel free to have a look around.”

We descended the stairs, and in the basement we discovered what could be that aforementioned book collector-with-occasional-fastidiousness’s personal library. There is a small open case of signed editions including Jhumpa Lahiri’s novel The Namesake and John Updike’s memoir Self-conscious. There is a table with a few antique bookends and crates of LPs. The floor-to-ceiling shelves (or ceiling-to-shelf for you Reaganites) which wrap around the basement have all of the basics: History, Literature, Gardening, Religion, and beyond. I found myself loitering between the sections of World War I and Gardening books, an area which houses several dozen volumes of transportation books, broken down further into a shelf each of Trains and Railroad, Ships and Navigation, and Automobiles. For any of you skeptical of the majesty of the railroad, please find a first edition folio of Robert S. Henry’s Portraits of the Iron Horse in its original cloth binding, and get back to me. I can’t promise I won't say I told you so.

I would like to report on each book I found that piqued my interest, but I fear you will race yourself to Chicago Rare and raid my wishlist. I would also like to report a conversation with Pat about, as I dumbly stated to him, “What it is you do, and why you do it.” Suffice it instead to say, I’ll be back another time when he is less entrenched in cataloguing a haul of books from an out-of-town fair. When I return, I hope to find, spellbound with me.

Subject Matters

by Gretchen Kalwinski on Dec 07, 2011

Literarily: Print and Digital Lit MagsLiterarily: Print and Digital Lit Mags

I’m long overdue in submitting a book review of Ann Beattie’s New Yorker Stories to a very patient literary editor but now that the Fall semester is over, I’m preparing to take on Beattie's tome by reading the reviews of her recent Mrs. Nixon: A Novelist Imagines a LifeThe Nation calls it a genre-defying work, “a kind of Cubist portrait-cum-metafictional excursus” (the Wall Street Journal, less kindly, dismisses it as a “hodgepodge of genres”). My interest in the book comes mostly from a craft perspective—since Beattie’s short stories are about aimless, drifting 1960’s-era young people. Mrs. Nixon represents a revisitation of that era through an opposing viewpoint.

Pat Nixon is generally regarded as little more than a quiet, generic housewife. In Mrs. Nixon, Beattie pulls her into the forefront, speculating about her marriage, offering, for example, a playful scene where she bakes cookies with Hillary Clinton and nine ideas as to Mrs. Nixon’s possible thoughts while standing in an elevator: i.e., “I may very well have forgotten to turn off the bathwater.”  

Most reviewers agree that Mrs. Nixon fails in its goal of giving the subject real dimension; that Beattie does not examine Pat Nixon’s inner life earnestly enough and that “her subject often seems a pretext, something just to get the conversation going.” In an interview with New York Magazine, Beattie admitted, “I think she was limited. I think the things that allowed her to get out of dirt-poor poverty and to put herself forward, and to work extremely hard, didn’t necessarily serve her very well in terms of looking at things from a distance, and ever saying, “Wait a minute, wait a minute.”

But back to craft. I haven’t yet read Mrs. Nixon, but am fascinated by the idea of an author engrossing herself in subject matter she once found, “very much not interested in—militantly not interested in.” The reviews indicate that by engaging with such an unappealing, cardboard-cutout of a subject, Beattie was forcing herself to consider an alternative view on her generation, yet ultimately found her own original take much more compelling.

Syndicate content